Immangel Nawa

  The legal system relies on a variety of terms to convey important information about court proceedings and decisions. Understanding the meaning of these terms is essential for anyone involved in a legal matter, whether as a party to a case or simply as an interested observer. In this article, we will explore six important court terms: court order, court judgement, verdict, court ruling, court direction, and court precedent. Court Order A court order is a directive issued by a judge or court that requires a party to take a certain action or refrain from taking a certain action. Court orders can be issued for a wide range of purposes, such as to compel a party to produce evidence, to grant a restraining order, or to enforce a judgement. Violating a court order can result in serious consequences, such as fines or even imprisonment. Court Judgement A court judgement is a formal decision made by a court at the end of a trial or other legal proceeding. A judgement can be entered in

  A vote of no confidence is a crucial mechanism in a parliamentary democracy that allows elected representatives to hold their government accountable. In Papua New Guinea, the constitutional implications of a successful vote of no confidence can be significant, as it can result in the removal of the Prime Minister and the appointment of a new one. In this article, we will examine the constitutional provisions that govern a vote of no confidence and explore the implications of a successful vote. Section 145 of the Papua New Guinea Constitution provides for a vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister. The section states that the Prime Minister may be removed from office by a vote of no confidence passed by a majority of the members of parliament. However, there is a grace period of 18 months, during which a vote of no confidence cannot be moved against the Prime Minister. If a vote of no confidence is successful, the Prime Minister and their government must resign, and a ne

In Papua New Guinea, a vote of no confidence is a mechanism that allows members of parliament to hold the government accountable. It is a constitutional provision that enables elected representatives to remove the Prime Minister and their government from office if they have lost the confidence of parliament. In this article, we will explain the steps and process in a vote of no confidence in Papua New Guinea, citing relevant provisions of the PNG Constitution and the Parliamentary Standing Orders. Step 1: Giving Notice of Motion The first step in the vote of no confidence process is giving notice of motion. According to Section 145(1) of the PNG Constitution, a member of parliament can move a motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister by giving notice of the motion to the Speaker of Parliament. The notice of motion must be in writing and must state the reasons for the motion of no confidence. Step 2: Debate on the Motion of No Confidence Once the notice of motion has

In Papua New Guinea, the vote of no confidence and the motion of no confidence are crucial tools for elected representatives to ensure that the government represents the interests of the people. This article aims to explain the significance of these mechanisms, how they work, and why they are essential for Papua New Guinea's democracy. By understanding these processes, readers can gain a deeper understanding of Papua New Guinea's political system and the importance of holding elected officials accountable. A vote of no confidence, also known as a motion of no confidence, is a crucial mechanism used to remove the Prime Minister or any other minister from power. This constitutional provision is outlined in Section 145 of the PNG Constitution, which states that "The Prime Minister shall be elected by members of the Parliament from among their number, and shall hold office during the pleasure of Parliament." However, if members of Parliament are dissatisfied with the

Dear Lawyers Community in Papua New Guinea, I am writing this letter to offer my sincerest apologies for any offense caused by my previous article titled "10 dirty tactics played by some crooked lawyers in PNG." I understand that this article may have caused distress and concern within your community, and for that, I am deeply sorry. I want to make it clear that my intention in writing that article was not to dispute the integrity of the legal profession in Papua New Guinea. Instead, my aim was to highlight and educate the public about unethical practices that some lawyers may engage in, which can tarnish the reputation of the profession as a whole. I understand that the legal profession in Papua New Guinea is an honorable one that serves to uphold justice and the rule of law. It is not my intention to diminish the hard work and dedication that lawyers put into their profession every day. My goal was to raise awareness about unethical practices that can damage the publi

  The Kumul Petroleum Holdings Limited (KPHL) is the state-owned enterprise responsible for managing the government's petroleum assets in Papua New Guinea (PNG). One of KPHL's key responsibilities is managing the 22.5% equity received from the oil and gas sector on behalf of the state. In this article, we will explore how KPHL manages, distributes, and reinvests this equity to promote the sustainable development of PNG's petroleum industry. Managing the Equity KPHL manages the 22.5% equity on behalf of the state through the Kumul Petroleum Fund (KPF). The KPF is a special trust account that holds the government's share of petroleum revenue. KPHL is responsible for managing the KPF in accordance with the Kumul Petroleum Holdings Limited Authorisation Act 2015 and the Public Finances (Management) Act 1995. Distributing the Equity KPHL distributes the equity received from the oil and gas sector to various stakeholders in accordance with the laws and regulations go